We receive complaints of interference in judiciary by ‘institutions’: LHC chief justice – Pakistan

Lahore High Court (LHC) Chief Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad on Friday said he has received complaints and letters — many verbally — of interference in judicial matters by “institutions”.

Addressing an event in Lahore, Justice Ahmed said, “It is this country’s misfortune that this started from the Moulvi Tamizuddin case and is still ongoing.

“We receive letters, complaints and oral complaints that interference is being done in the judiciary in which a few institutions — naming them is not appropriate — are involved,” he added.

The LHC chief justice said he was glad that the judiciary was “fulfilling its responsibilities without any fear or greed”.

Referring to recent claims of a sessions judge of a Sargodha Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) about interference in judicial matters by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Justice Ahmad said the judge in his complaint had stated he was not afraid of any of the incidents he allegedly faced.

“I am ready for any sacrifice that I might have to make but I would not do injustice to anyone,” Justice Ahmad quoted the ATC judge as saying.

The chief justice went on to say, “We have received other such complaints as well. Many complaints are not in written [form] as they say evidence would be demanded, which would be difficult to provide.”

On Wednesday, Justice Ahmad summoned Punjab Inspector General of Police (IGP) Usman Anwar and other officials on a complaint by a presiding judge of a Sargodha ATC, alleging harassment by the intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

The LHC registrar office had received a special report on June 7 from District & Sessions Judge (DSJ) Muhammad Abbas, wherein he said that on May 25 — the first day of his new charge as Sargodha ATC judge — a message was conveyed to him that some authority of the ISI wanted to meet him in his chamber.

Upon refusing to meet the said authority, DSJ Abbas alleged that ever since then, he had been encountering various incidents, such as firing outside his ATC and questioning from family members, among others.

A day ago, the Punjab IG informed the LHC that an investigation had been launched into the alleged threats.

“If excuses are to be made, then the courts should be closed,” Justice Ahmad remarked, reserving the verdict on the matter.

Earlier in March, six Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges — out of a total strength of eight — had written a startling letter to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) members, regarding attempts to pressure judges through the abduction and torture of their relatives as well as secret surveillance inside their homes.

It led to the Supreme Court taking suo motu notice of the matter, with high courts submitting their responses and recommendations as proceedings continued.

More to follow