Tech Jobs

TLP vice emir booked under terrorism law as govt vows ‘iron’ action on threats to top judge – Pakistan


Pir Zaheerul Hasan Shah, the vice-emir of Tehreek-i-Labbaik Paki­stan (TLP), has been booked in a terrorism case, it emerged on Monday, as the government vowed an “iron fist” response to elements inciting violence against a top judge.

The development comes after the TLP held a series of gatherings last week in various parts of the country against the Supreme Court’s judgement in the Mubarak Sani case, which was recently reviewed by the apex court in light of a plea filed by the Punjab government.

Sani was booked under sections 7 and 9 of the Punjab Holy Quran (Printing and Recording) Act, 2011, for a crime he allegedly committed in 2019. However, the Supreme Court had ruled that the said provisions were made part of the law in 2021, two years after the crime was allegedly committed.

At one of the gatherings outside the Lahore Press Club, where TLP chief Saad Rizvi was also in attendance, Shah had delivered remarks amounting to incitement of violence against Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa.

While the party vice emir had clarified that he was speaking in a personal capacity, the remarks drew immediate condemnation from official circles.

TLP vice-emir Pir Zaheerul Hasan Shah, along with 1,400-1,500 unnamed suspects, was booked by Lahore’s Qila Gujjar Singh police last night, according to the first information report (FIR), a copy of which is available with Dawn.com.

The FIR, filed on the complaint of Station House Officer Hammad Hussain, was registered under sections 6 (terrorism), 7 (punishment for acts of terrorism), and 11W (printing, publishing, or disseminating any material to incite hatred or giving projection to any person convicted for a terrorist act or any proscribed organisation or an organisation placed under observation) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997.

It further invoked sections 337(i) (shajjah, intentionally causing hurt), 337(ii), 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), 116 (abetment of offence), 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant), 505(ii) (statements conducing to public mischief), 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence), 290 (public nuisance) and 291 (continuance of nuisance after injunction to discontinue) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

In the FIR, the complainant said he was performing his duties at the Lahore Press Club where the TLP event was taking place.

He quoted remarks made in Punjabi by Shah on the occasion, and mentioned that a head money of Rs10m was offered for engaging in violence against the top judge.

The complaint added that Shah “threatened” the CJP and “spread religious hatred” through his statement. It further said that the group had blocked roads and gathered despite the imposition of Section 144, which banned such an assembly.

reported.

Addressing a joint news conference with clerics in Rawalpindi today, Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Attaullah Tarar strongly condemned the issuance of fatwas (decrees) against CJP Isa.

He said the issue had “gone beyond condemnation” and “would be dealt with an iron fist”.

Tarar asserted there was “no space in our society” for such inciting remarks, adding that there were “political motives” behind them. He further highlighted that a case under the anti-terrorism laws had been registered.

He also called out the religiopolitical group for issuing “politically motivated false statements” against the top judge and said that there was no room for such rhetoric in Pakistan.

“There is no room for such statements in the State of Pakistan and it will not be tolerated,” Tarar said on the X platform.

“Qazi sahab did not announce a decision in favour of any group based on which this hateful narrative is being propagated. We strongly condemn and strongly deny such statements, as such mentality is causing serious damage to Pakistan,” his post said.

In his condemnation, Pakistan Ulema Council head Tahir Ashrafi said that ulema had always condemned violent sentiments, adding that such remarks would hurt their cause.


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button