SC disposes of case through which Justice Isa-led bench dominated in opposition to CJP’s powers – Pakistan

The Supreme Courtroom on Tuesday disposed of the suo motu case pertaining to the 2018 regulation of the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) that urged an award of 20 extra marks to candidates for memorising the Holy Quran by coronary heart to get MBBS or BDS levels.

On March 29, a three-member bench heard the identical case throughout which Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Aminuddin Khan had ruled that the chief justice of Pakistan (CJP) didn’t have the ability to make particular benches or determine its members.

The apex court docket judges had stated that each one hearings primarily based on suo motu notices and instances of constitutional significance — below Article 184(3) — must be postponed till they have been legislated upon.

Nevertheless, Justice Shahid Waheed had dissented from the decision in his minority ruling, saying that judges couldn’t increase objections concerning the structure of benches as a result of in the event that they achieve this they might change into a complainant and it could not be applicable for them to listen to the case.

On March 31, a round was issued by the SC registrar’s workplace, adopted by a one-page court docket order, disregarding the directives, and including that the bench had travelled past the case earlier than it, which had prompted Justice Isa to pen a scathing letter to the registrar.

Click on the button to load the content from

Load content

Earlier as we speak, a six-member bigger bench, headed by Justice Ijazul Ahsan and comprising Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazahar, Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, was constituted to listen to the case at 2pm.

Through the listening to — which lasted a complete of 5 minutes — the PMDC counsel, Afnan Kundi, contended that 20 extra marks have been awarded to college students for memorising the Holy Quran up till 2018.

“New guidelines have been formulated in 2021 and the method of awarding extra marks was dropped at an finish,” Kundi stated.

Subsequently, the court docket disposed of the case on account of it being “ineffective”.

tersely worded letter through which he urged the Cupboard Division to recall the registrar to “forestall him from additional damaging the status and integrity of the Supreme Courtroom”.

The decide additionally sought disciplinary proceedings in opposition to the registrar, Ishrat Ali, for apparently violating the Structure and the March 29 order.

The 2-page letter, addressed to the registrar, was additionally copied to the cupboard secretary by way of the Legal professional Normal for Pakistan and Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial.

Following the letter, the federal government, throughout a gathering of the federal cupboard, agreed to recall the companies of the registrar.

Source link

Show More
Back to top button
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :