Chinese overcapacity is raising concerns worldwide. It is easy to see why: China accounts for nearly one-third of the world’s manufacturing value added and one-fifth of global manufacturing exports. But there is good reason to believe that the decline of China’s manufacturing sector is imminent.
To understand what is happening now in China, it is worth recalling Japan’s recent history. After World War II, Japan’s manufacturing sector grew rapidly, thanks largely to access to the massive US market. But the 1985 Plaza Accord – which boosted the yen’s value and weakened Japanese exports – together with an ageing population and a shrinking labour force, reversed this trend.
From 1985 to 2022, the share of Japanese goods in US imports dropped from 22 per cent to 5 per cent, and Japan’s share of global manufacturing exports declined from 16 per cent to 4 per cent. Moreover, Japan’s share of global manufacturing value added fell sharply, from 22 per cent in 1992 to 5 per cent in 2022. The number of Japanese companies on the Fortune Global 500 list dropped from 149 in 1995 to just 41 today.
China has followed a similar upward trajectory in recent decades, but its manufacturing rise was even more dependent on the US market. Japan’s imports from the United States equalled 51 per cent of its exports to the US in 1978-84, compared to a 23 per cent per cent share for China in 2001-18.
Chinese family-planning policies are largely to blame for this imbalance. Typically, household disposable income would account for 60-70 per cent of a country’s GDP to sustain household consumption of around 60 per cent of GDP. In China, however, the one-child policy – which was in place from 1980 until 2015 – limited household earnings, encouraged high savings and constrained domestic demand.
As a result, Chinese household disposable income dropped to 44 per cent of GDP today, with household consumption falling from 53 per cent of GDP to 37 per cent of GDP. In Japan, by contrast, household consumption equals 56 per cent of GDP. One can look at it this way: if wages would normally amount to US$60-US$70, Chinese workers receive only US$44 and have just US$37 of spending power, whereas Japanese workers have US$56 of spending power.
03:23
China posts record-low birth rate despite government push for babies
China posts record-low birth rate despite government push for babies
China’s government, however, has plenty of financial resources which it uses to support industrial subsidies and investment in manufacturing. Moreover, because China’s manufacturing sector offers high returns, international investors are willing to channel capital towards it.
Given insufficient demand at home, China’s only option for reducing its excess capacity and creating enough jobs for its population is to maintain a large current account surplus. That is where the US comes in: the share of Chinese goods in US imports rose from 1 per cent in 1985 to about 22 per cent in 2017.
China’s giant surplus is the mirror image of America’s deficit, and while the rise of Chinese manufacturing is hardly the only reason for the decline of US manufacturing, it is a big one. The US share of world manufacturing exports remained fairly stable until 2000, but it fell sharply after China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001. The US share of manufacturing value added likewise fell from 25 per cent in 2000 to 16 per cent in 2021.
As these trends hurt the US rust belt, popular frustration with globalisation and the political elite who encouraged it grew steadily. In 2016, Donald Trump rode their frustration into the White House, vowing to revive US manufacturing and force China to change its trading practices. Trump hopes to do the same this November.
In this sense, China’s one-child policy indirectly but profoundly reshaped the American political landscape. Now, American politics are reshaping China’s economy. The US backlash against China, which began with Trump’s tariffs in 2018, has intensified under US President Joe Biden.
Beyond losing the US market, China is losing some of its own manufacturing companies, which are shifting part of their production to countries such as Vietnam and Mexico to avoid US tariffs. This partial transfer augurs a wider withdrawal, much like that faced by Japan’s manufacturing sector as it fell into decline.
01:52
US proposes new round of tariffs on China in latest trade war escalation
US proposes new round of tariffs on China in latest trade war escalation
China is looking increasingly like Japan for two other reasons. First, its workforce is rapidly shrinking and ageing. According to government figures, annual births plummeted to just 9 million last year, and even that figure is probably exaggerated. Meanwhile, the median age of migrant workers, who make up 80 per cent of China’s manufacturing workforce, has risen from 34 in 2008 to almost 43, with the share of people over 50 rising to 30 per cent. Some manufacturing plants are already closing for lack of workers.
Second, China’s services sector is set to squeeze manufacturing. As China’s government seeks to increase the GDP share of household disposable income, Chinese demand for US goods will rise. Some manufacturing workers will shift to services, which is also where China’s rapidly growing pool of college graduates will find employment.
The decline of manufacturing might not happen as fast as it did in Japan. China has a larger domestic market and a more complete industrial ecosystem, and it is investing heavily in artificial intelligence and robotics, which could deliver productivity gains. But decline is both inevitable and irreversible. Unfortunately for the US, however, this will not necessarily bring about a revival of its domestic manufacturing.
Yi Fuxian is a senior scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and author of Big Country with an Empty Nest. Copyright:Project Syndicate
