Cricket, once revered as the gentleman’s game, is now at the mercy of financial clout and political manoeuvring, threatening its very soul. What was once a battle of skill and sportsmanship has been hijacked by power-hungry administrators who wield influence, not through merit but through economic dominance.
Nowhere is this more apparent than in the 2025 Champions Trophy, where India, backed by its financial stranglehold over the International Cricket Council (ICC), has engineered a tournament structure to its exclusive benefit. The decision to let India play all its matches in Dubai while the rest of the teams endure grueling travel and logistical burdens is nothing short of a farcical distortion of fair play, reducing international cricket to a mere pawn in the hands of one board’s monopolistic ambitions. This blatant favoritism raises serious questions about the credibility of global cricketing events and whether the ICC has surrendered its authority to the highest bidder.
Former England captains Nasser Hussain and Michael Atherton have openly criticized this unfair arrangement, pointing out that India’s uninterrupted stay in Dubai allows them to acclimatize to conditions while other teams are subjected to fatigue, unpredictable pitch variations, and scheduling disadvantages. Hussain, a staunch advocate for cricketing integrity, lamented that India’s special treatment distorts the competition, making it less about skill and more about privilege. Atherton, known for his sharp analysis, emphasized that while other teams are forced into exhaustive travel schedules, India enjoys the comfort of a single venue, giving them an undue advantage in preparation, team selection, and strategic execution. This contrived arrangement is not an isolated incident but a manifestation of a larger, more sinister trend— one where financial muscle dictates the rules, undermining the very spirit of international cricket.
The excuse of “security concerns” has become a convenient tool in India’s playbook to target Pakistan and manipulate global cricketing affairs. While international teams, including Australia, England, and New Zealand, have played in Pakistan without issue, India continues to peddle baseless allegations to avoid travelling to the country. The hypocrisy is evident— Pakistan has hosted full-fledged home series and even high-profile leagues like the Pakistan Super League (PSL) with stringent security measures. If England, South Africa, and even New Zealand, which once backed out of a series citing last-minute security threats, can confidently return to play in Pakistan, what justification does India have to remain isolated? The reality is clear: security is merely a pretext, a geopolitical tool wielded by the Board of Control for Cricket in India to exert dominance over the ICC and marginalize Pakistan on the international stage. This reflects not just an unjustifiable bias in cricket but a broader strategy that aligns with India’s extremist foreign policy— where political hostilities are deliberately transposed onto the sporting arena, further damaging diplomatic ties and fragmenting the global cricketing fraternity.
Logistical nightmares for other teams further expose the glaring inequities in this tournament’s planning. Teams like New Zealand and South Africa have been compelled to crisscross between Pakistan and Dubai, facing significant travel fatigue and inconsistency in playing conditions. Unlike India, which enjoys a stable preparation phase, these teams must constantly adapt to new venues, different pitches, and varied climatic conditions. New Zealand captain Kane Williamson, the epitome of sportsmanship and professionalism, diplomatically stated that his team remains focused on the game despite the evident hurdles. However, behind this reserved stance lies a broader truth— New Zealand, like many other teams, is being forced into an unfair contest where India gets to dictate the terms while others scramble to adjust. When a sport’s governing body prioritizes one nation’s convenience over the rest, it ceases to be an impartial competition and becomes a rigged spectacle.
Critics across the cricketing world, from Australia to England, have voiced their concerns about the ICC’s increasing subservience to the BCCI. Respected journalist Jonathan Agnew did not mince words when he pointed out that India’s unchecked influence is eroding the credibility of global cricket. The ICC’s willingness to bend over backward to accommodate India’s demands sets a dangerous precedent— one where money, rather than merit, dictates the sport’s future. Cricket is no longer about equal competition but about who can wield the largest financial hammer. If the governing body continues to appease a single board at the cost of the sport’s integrity, it risks alienating the very audience that keeps the game alive. Fans and analysts alike are already questioning whether international tournaments retain any semblance of fairness or whether they have devolved into scripted showcases designed to serve India’s hegemony.
This episode of the Champions Trophy is not just a sporting controversy— it is a grim warning for the future of cricket. When geopolitical agendas and financial monopolies seep into the game, they corrode its foundational values. The ICC’s failure to stand up to the BCCI’s overreach signals the death of impartial governance in cricket, leaving the sport vulnerable to further manipulation. If left unchecked, India’s stranglehold on the game will soon extend beyond tournament logistics to rule-making, broadcasting rights, and even scheduling, reducing the once-global game to a tool of corporate and political machinations.
The world of cricket stands at a perilous crossroads. Either the ICC reasserts its independence and ensures an equitable playing field for all, or it continues down this path of favouritism, eroding the sport’s credibility. The choice is clear: cricket must be rescued from the clutches of monopolistic exploitation, or it will be reduced to a hollow spectacle where outcomes are dictated not by talent but by economic supremacy. If international cricket is to survive as a fair and competitive sport, the world must resist India’s hegemonic grip before it is too late.
Source link
